And just as the British empire used opium to keep the Chinese population down, the Chinese government is now using fentanyl to do the same to the United States.
I was struck by the following passage, which I altered by changing the country in question:
"The CHINESE System sought to make CHINA the 'workshop of the world,' with a global monopoly on industrial production. Other countries were to provide food and raw materials, in exchange for CHINESE manufactures.
By contrast, the American System encouraged national self-sufficiency. Americans were urged to produce everything they needed in their own country, including food, raw materials and manufactures.
The two systems were incompatible and bound to collide."
Change the year to 2023 and we are in a similar situation, with America trying to reclaim the American System that in abandoned over the past 25 years or so. Or, at least, move manufacturing out of China to countries more closely aligned with American interests, if not to America itself.
Trump was trying to bring manufacturing back to the US. He raised tariffs against the Chinese. It's believed the Chinese respect Trump as they understand his motives and goals were simply to do what is best for America. Trump would wage economic war, if you want to call it that, whereas others would threaten military conflict.
Germany was put under Bolshevik-2 from 1918 to 1933 when it was put down:
America been under Bolshevik-3 Esp. since the end of WW2 = incrementally because "WE the People" are well armed & why D-Rats are always trying to disarm us;
Exactly = they want all nations under their chosen tool of choice being Communism being Atheist MarXism to easily then usher in the NWO under a OWGov. and they are Luciferian in a Darkness not yet undercovered for the world to see as defini-tively antiChrist in essence...!
I believe it all stems from the Kaballah. From : The Protocols Of The Learned Elders Of Zion--- " We Appear on the scene, as ALLEGED saviors of the worker, from his oppression. When we propose to him, to enter the ranks, Of Our Fighting forces. Socialists, Anarchists, Communists, to whom we always give support, in accordance with an ALLEGED brotherly Rule, of the solidarity of humanity, of OUR social masonry. " In short, they are all agents of the very same hand. Driving the public towards the single, chosen goal.
There’s a film called “gone with the wind”and in that film is Rhett Butler. His character is based in two people butler who smuggled and broke blockades and the Rhett’s the people seriously involved in the cessation who were descendants of king Charles 2 supporters who built Charleston ( and Cromwell descendants ) well worth a read up on .
If the British had ordered the Royal Navy to break the blockade, it would have been done. The Russians would not have prevented it. There is more than enough evidence that points to the fact that the British did not inspire Lincoln's war.
Nah of they didn't for the more opposition the more risk...lol.
Just like you lying back stabbing pricks tried sneaking up the Mississippi til taught a lesson in 45 minutes caused the fn "Crown"
loss for àll taste for War with the U.S, in seeing what Andrew Jackson did to you gutless cowards-> always needing protection of massive forces, didn't help you dumb asses there either...huh...lol
And this by us Mt.men, Farmers and Hillbilly's = whopped the tar outta ya bigtime and ya'll feared a repeat of that huh...0oops
I'm not British. I'm American. There is a lot out there that tells why the Brits did not support the Confederacy. They were under pressure to do so, however, but there was nothing to be gained by doing so.
There is nothing "puzzling or intractable" about the political philosophy that inspired, and was explicated within, The Constitution of The United States of America.
You have written at length here and elsewhere regarding the empires of the world, providing historical evidence for the motivations of different actors on the world stage, with a zeal that demands commendation.
This commendation I offer to you with a humble request; Tell me where in the following citation you find some defense for the prevention by force, by murderous violence, of self-determination for a people?
"When in the Course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another, and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.
We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.--That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, --That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn, that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security."
Love my kin just as much as the next person. We are different and have always been subservient in class structure to the people you mention. The game you seek is not national it is purly satanic.
I have been saying for decades that as "Cotton was King" funded by the Globalist oeners of Britain = all cotton went to British cotton mills that sold exclusively the cloth monoply they had thruout the world esp thru cheap slave labor cotton producing cloth in their child slave labor factory's;
Just realize the "City of London" banksters owned the British Empire even in 1776, and certainly did own the South monetarily right on thru 1861 in the South and wanted to continue cheap slave labor cotton and extended clear thru California as "Slave States":
Southern white worker classes were just above the black slaves so merely white slave classes beholden to the billionaire plsntation owners who were directly tied to the Globalist owned British industry giants world trade controllers...!
I'VE WRITTEN THIS ALL FOR MANY YRS
The very Globalist's WE kicked out in 1783 also were behind OUR unCivil War to divide and reconquer America economically...!
All this is easily understood once honestly researched...!
The Globalist new main branch offIce became the FED/IRS take over in 1913, to used to fund their setup Euro Civil War to take down Germany-[became WWI (1914) once they inserted their installed POTUS Wilson], while funding Lenin/Stalin to install Communist slavery over the Russian people via Bolshevik-1;
Once Germany was broken in 1918 had their U.S. FED actor's draw up the "Treaty of Versaille" to further crush the German people to accept a " Bolshevik-2 " for their attempted Coup there lasting 15yrs(1918-33) which failed once President Hindenburg appointed Adolf/Nat.Soc. as the 3rd Temprary Chancellor to stop the CommieCoup(I know this attempted over throw for my father was in firefights with those Communist terrorists they paid = just like ANTIFA/BLM here only armed there-> from 1919 to 1928 when he imigrated here, my mother had come here already prior...!
The Nat.Soc. Party headed by adolf only arose because of this concerted effort to take Germany down into Communism so later once armed up Stalin would have a partnership with Germany as Communist's, NOT have to fight them(one which they could never win);
For the plan was Communism for the entire European Continent to usher in their NWO = then America to be taken from within-> already in their incremental setup " Bolshevik-3 " here with in players in place like John Dewey to indoctrinate education and who's system was already used by Stalin;
Then crashed OUR stock market to create an intentional Depression to install their man FDR("friend of Stalin") "The New Deal" an appointed Agency DeepState, confiscate all Gold, install Ponsi SocSec scam by No., and then later their UN on American soil while selling us to the IMF in WWII at Bretton Woods by OUR SocSec No. = total enslavement of the American People cradle to grave...!
A relatively recent book by Anton Chaitkin - 'Who we are' is of interest in connection with the still polarised debate about the civil war. Since several otherwise learned observers seem to me to have got it wrong about Andrew Jackson I recommend this source, Chaitkin writes that Andrew Jackson was the first wholly foreign-owned US president.
He did not conceal that he defended the slave owners.
And likewise Thomas Jefferson. He had 600 slaves
My suspicion is that the angloamerican establishment that Carroll Quigley exposes has played a significant role in maintaining the confusion and omission about the importance of slavery and the libertarians are known to speak well of letting people depend on begging in the steets and not have any social safety nets other than what they get from generous people but where there isnt any legalized social welfair. Like in 19th century Britain
Libertarians point to Britains 1830s as a time when libertarianism worked just fine
The politicians were so powerless that it wasnt any point in bribing them
Carroll Quigleys exposure of the concerned elite group actually having undergone a name change to Pilgrim Society after Cexil Rhodes death merits more attention if one desires to understand what is behind the modern US. Not at all detached from the former colonial master
The 19th century is surprisingly little understood and I believe that is because secret societies like freemasonry dominated by the anglosaxons played a decisive role.
That also entails everything related to the Israel Project and Zionism. Freemasons played a decisive role and the original american freemasons who were the revolutionaries were purged by Palmerston during 1826-1840 resulting in the vanishing of the originally christian patriots and the rise of the Scottish Rite in the US
That period also comprises the year 1833 when Skull and Bones was established.
(Did Palmerston have a hand in that too?)
Skull and Bones had surprisingly many things in common with the british led angloamerican establishment. In my view they both practised Hegelian strategy of creating opposites to foment the sort of crisis that would eventually lead to the welcoming of a world government
Edgar Allan Poe played a role in an effort to spread the revolutionary ideas to Europe but was systematically blackpainted by Britains helpers. A very masonic method to alter history, to conform with the aims of the ruling circles
When it comes to Andrew Jackson I beg to differ. He was in collusion with the slave owners and not at all a champion fighting for the little people like it is sometimes claimed by the so called Jacksonians.
That in my view is an entirely false libertarian myth.
On the contrary he was a traitor. Working for Britain.
The slaveowners and Britain had the aim of weakening the federal power because it was anticipated that a strong federal economy would result in freeing the slaves.
Consequently the slave owners didt want the US federal government to have a strong economy. Thats the ugly truth behind all the nonsense talk about weakening the state.
That is what the libertarians are defending although I dont think they ever come out of the closet about it.
Britain would buy cotton to the manchester industries. During the civil war they also bought from India and Egypt. They would enjoy free trade and on the same time would know they had averted that the US would build a successful industry.
Americans would benefit from dumping libertarianism and to begin uniting the state and the private enterprises to build infrastructure and I think they ought to listen to Jeremy Rifkind
As it seems to me the americans are incredibly ignorant about their own history.
I dont understand how intelligent and responsible americans are willing to live with this annoying situation.
You've some correct, yet Jackson absolutely HATED & despised the BritishEsp. along with the bankster overlords that financed and owned the British Empire for 100yrs already then...!
Jackson also stopped the move of secession by Calhoun in it's tracks;
On his death bed asked of his greatest accomplishments stated "I finally stopped the Central Banks and their monetary control"
As to the bankster's reacquiring us in 1913 and subsequent use of the Atheist MarXist John Dewey to intentionally undermine education here(his corriculum was used by Ghoul Stalin in Soviet Schools), for too deeply knowledgeable Americans would only hinder the Globalist taking total
control here which is required = IF they expect one day to implement their NWO worldwide using Communism as their chosen tool to do it;
Andrew Jackson played into the hands of the British so when people believe Jackson's hatred of the British was decisive it helped the British to manipulate the US in Britains favour. Jackson like all politicians are actors.
One of the more popular acts the British employ is to paint the picture that the Rothschilds are pulling the strings behind the scenes. Jews like Disraeli were employed to spread this impression and was rewarded with becoming Britains prime minister.
But that doesnt mean Disraeli was right. The bankers are allowed influence over imperial finances in return for lojalty. There are no genuine international bankers
The thing about the early american national banking was that it enabled the US to start building infrastructure by allowing foreign bankers to gain profits but not to control the banks. Any arrangement where foreign bankers would have been treated like a den of vipers would of course have turned them away from the win-win Hamilton knew was necessary.
Concerning NWO it is part of the Skull and Bones groups agenda as well as part of the Cecil Rhodes groups agenda that was renamed to Pilgrim Society after Rhodes death.
This aim for a world government in the hands of the anglosaxons means they want the big rival countries to be manouevered by collectivist leaders. Socialist collectivists vs fascist collectivists in a polarised world that would eventually beg the anglosaxons to solve the conflict with their world government.
There never was any independent communism in the east nor in the west.
The US Army aided the bolshevisk to power and 'the reds thanked their american friends for having saved their movement in a difficult moment'. In the case of General Graves army it was about preventing the Japanese from taking the transibirian railway.
The British army promised Lenin not to give the white armies enough help if Lenin would assassinate the Tsar and all subseequent heirs and in addition to sink the fleet.
The situation in China had some other elements for example Chiang Kai Chek collaborated with the japanese that the US was fighting. Bit of a problem.
But the YMCA offered Maos adepts a training ground in their 'Christian' localities
americans4innovation have written informatively about that
But significantly - Bertrand Russel and the John Dewey you mention were very clear about preventing a capitalist China from Rising.
Stalin predicted in 1930 that they would be attacked in a decade so nothing to do but to industrialise. The anglosaxons mounted gold bockades to prevent the Soviets from importing machinery paid in gold. Howevere they were allowed to pay in grain.
This despite the fact that there was plenty of grain on the world market.
As it turned out draught happened but the anglosaxons were happy about the Soviets having to starve to pay british and american machines.
The Hurst press used this in the propaganda to demonise the Soviets.
At home in the US there was depression and the working class was suffering.
Hence red scare that Hurst battled.
so the Holodomor meme was much wanted by the oligarchy
"Time is the fire in which we burn." Folks, we are running out of time to make changes and take action that can restore our Constitutional government and the American way of life.
Just wake up to the fact Stalin genocided 20million of his own thru 1932, Adolf wasn’t even appointed the 3rd•Temp till ‘33;
By 1941 Ghoul Stalin + murdering Soviet murdered another 20million of his own and invaded 6 nations YET all that talked about is Adolf, and none have a clue as WHY & HOW he even was there because they’ve actually no idea rooted in the truth;
Stalin made a piker of Adolf’s entire later career before Adolf was even in the scene as a Temp. is 33, let alone the 100million he helped slaughter before the monster finally croaked his last:
It would seem that diligent persons might want to understand the real history of what went on in the lead up directly because of U.S. when in wrong involvement or no involvement when it should have;
Instead of the Globalist funded U.S. Big Ed. tells them what to regurgitate as whatever they’re told to, It is wearying trying to connect folks with what was 80+% ommitted as is in ALL Fake News & U.S. Educational Globalist outlets…!
Seems people would be ready to connect real dots drawing the true bigger picture which is 180° of what's been told to think and regurgitation as taught:
Globalist new main branch offIce the FED/IRS take over in 1913, funded their setup Euro Civil War to take down Germany-[to became WWI (1914) once they inserted their installed puppet Wilson], while funding Lenin/Stalin to install Communist slavery over the Russian people via Bolshevik-1;
Once Germany was broken in 1918 had their U.S. FED actor's draw up the "Treaty of Versaille" to further crush the German people to accept a " Bolshevik-2 " for their attempted Coup there lasting 15yrs(1918-33) which failed once President Hindenburg appointed Adolf/Nat.Soc. as the 3rd Temprary Chancellor to stop this Commie Coup = my own father was in firefights with those Globalist bankster paid Communist terrorists just as are ANTIFA/BLM here, only then they were armed there-> from 1919 to 1928 then he imigrated here, my mother had come already prior...!
The Nat.Soc. Party headed by Adolf sadly only arose because of this concerted effort to take Germany down into Communism via a Bolshevik-2 so then later once armed up Stalin would have a partnership with Germany as both Communist's, NOT have to fight them(one which they could never win);
For the plan was Communism for the entire European Continent to usher in their NWO = then America to be taken from within-> already in their incremental setup " Bolshevik-3 " here with in players in place like John Dewey to indoctrinate education and who's system was already used by Ghoul Stalin in Soviet schools;
Then in '29 crashed OUR stock market to create an intentional Depression to install their man FDR("friend of Stalin") "The New Deal" an appointed Agency DeepState, confiscate all Gold, install Ponsi SocSec scam by No., and then later their UN on American soil while selling us to the IMF in WWII at Bretton Woods by OUR SocSec No. = total enslavement of the American People cradle to grave...!
You are obsessed by one particular communist rebel at least partly trained in London who eventually managed to prevent Britains evil plans to use the USSR as one component in NWO led by the anglosaxons.
Like Richard Poe tells us about the american civil war he also tells us about how the british was behind the spread of communism.
You didnt comment about what I said about the US/UKs assistance for putting communism in power in both Russia and China
I now add that the americans definitely put both Castro and the Sandinistas in power so the US was behind communism there to!
It is weird how anglosaxons go on with their mantra about megadeath by others but simultaneously omit how they themselves were instrumental in causing it
Both through financing and through deliberate Hegelian strategy aiming towards the NWO the anglosaxons have been after ever since the anglosaxons caused the 'French' revolution.
As long as you refer to those you think rule the world as globalists without explaining that every part of it goes back to the anglosaxon elite societies to which all the bankers are subservient you are either an agent of influence or a puppet for those anglosaxon elites and their preferred narrative.
Wake up and go beyond the meagre historical narrative that omits them!
Carroll Quigley did an effort to explain what was going on but was largely frosen out of his career.
It is too simple to misdirect people by just not giving authors fair credit.
With Anthony Sutton there was the additional complexity associated with Nixons generous deal with the Soviets in order to make them shut up about the nonexistent american manned space program.
It falls on you and other part-info's IF you want to expand your stuck limited grasp of real history in the true bigger historical picture by personal due diligence to research the connections to see that picture = not up to me to slow down to spoon fed those stuck in a cul de sac to backtrack & get on moving forward...!
You dont explain anything by that answer and I think you may find - if you try - that real history isnt what you thought. The powerful angloamerican establishment like its oligarchic forebears often was on both sides. I find it annoying that this important aspect is often overlooked.
A lot of history here that I was not aware of but I cannot understand how such an ostensibly detailed account the of the Civil War could have no mention of how Lincoln funded the war, no mention of money or the greenbacks despite mentions of Henry Carey, Lincoln's chief economic advisor and propoenent of issueing the greenbacks, without which the Union would have lost the war.
And just as the British empire used opium to keep the Chinese population down, the Chinese government is now using fentanyl to do the same to the United States.
And since the porous border enhances the drug trafficking, one could make a case of collusion between Biden and China.
Are you sure it’s the Chinese? Not considering alternatives seems like turning a blind eye to what Poe is writing about.
I was struck by the following passage, which I altered by changing the country in question:
"The CHINESE System sought to make CHINA the 'workshop of the world,' with a global monopoly on industrial production. Other countries were to provide food and raw materials, in exchange for CHINESE manufactures.
By contrast, the American System encouraged national self-sufficiency. Americans were urged to produce everything they needed in their own country, including food, raw materials and manufactures.
The two systems were incompatible and bound to collide."
Change the year to 2023 and we are in a similar situation, with America trying to reclaim the American System that in abandoned over the past 25 years or so. Or, at least, move manufacturing out of China to countries more closely aligned with American interests, if not to America itself.
Trump was trying to bring manufacturing back to the US. He raised tariffs against the Chinese. It's believed the Chinese respect Trump as they understand his motives and goals were simply to do what is best for America. Trump would wage economic war, if you want to call it that, whereas others would threaten military conflict.
The Bolshevik bot farm is still trying to cover for their criminals.
BOLSHEVIKS ARE ALWAYS THE PROBLEM.
Germany was put under Bolshevik-2 from 1918 to 1933 when it was put down:
America been under Bolshevik-3 Esp. since the end of WW2 = incrementally because "WE the People" are well armed & why D-Rats are always trying to disarm us;
See- Communist Goals for America
https://www.marxists.org/subject/art/literature/children/ref/gov/gov1.html
Folly to blame a nation when the bankers have no nation.
Exactly = they want all nations under their chosen tool of choice being Communism being Atheist MarXism to easily then usher in the NWO under a OWGov. and they are Luciferian in a Darkness not yet undercovered for the world to see as defini-tively antiChrist in essence...!
I believe it all stems from the Kaballah. From : The Protocols Of The Learned Elders Of Zion--- " We Appear on the scene, as ALLEGED saviors of the worker, from his oppression. When we propose to him, to enter the ranks, Of Our Fighting forces. Socialists, Anarchists, Communists, to whom we always give support, in accordance with an ALLEGED brotherly Rule, of the solidarity of humanity, of OUR social masonry. " In short, they are all agents of the very same hand. Driving the public towards the single, chosen goal.
Good and informative read .
There’s a film called “gone with the wind”and in that film is Rhett Butler. His character is based in two people butler who smuggled and broke blockades and the Rhett’s the people seriously involved in the cessation who were descendants of king Charles 2 supporters who built Charleston ( and Cromwell descendants ) well worth a read up on .
If the British had ordered the Royal Navy to break the blockade, it would have been done. The Russians would not have prevented it. There is more than enough evidence that points to the fact that the British did not inspire Lincoln's war.
Russian Tsar Alexander II supported the Union, sending a Russian Navy Squadron to both New York and San Francisco and were much welcomed...!
So what? The Tsar's Navy did not exactly inspire fear in the foremost naval power of that age.
"so what" = the British did squat that's WHAT-> never happened...huh
Didn't happen because the Brits had no plan to support the Confederates. London could not have cared less what the Tsar did with his Navy.
That's why "so what?"
Of course you were at the meeting right...lol
Nah of they didn't for the more opposition the more risk...lol.
Just like you lying back stabbing pricks tried sneaking up the Mississippi til taught a lesson in 45 minutes caused the fn "Crown"
loss for àll taste for War with the U.S, in seeing what Andrew Jackson did to you gutless cowards-> always needing protection of massive forces, didn't help you dumb asses there either...huh...lol
And this by us Mt.men, Farmers and Hillbilly's = whopped the tar outta ya bigtime and ya'll feared a repeat of that huh...0oops
I'm not British. I'm American. There is a lot out there that tells why the Brits did not support the Confederacy. They were under pressure to do so, however, but there was nothing to be gained by doing so.
CIA Jesuits
As an Australian I never fully understood the origin of the fratricidal American civil war… Thank you for this wonderful piece of research!
There is nothing "puzzling or intractable" about the political philosophy that inspired, and was explicated within, The Constitution of The United States of America.
You have written at length here and elsewhere regarding the empires of the world, providing historical evidence for the motivations of different actors on the world stage, with a zeal that demands commendation.
This commendation I offer to you with a humble request; Tell me where in the following citation you find some defense for the prevention by force, by murderous violence, of self-determination for a people?
"When in the Course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another, and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.
We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.--That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, --That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn, that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security."
- Declaration of Independence, July 4th, 1776
Thank you for writing
Love my kin just as much as the next person. We are different and have always been subservient in class structure to the people you mention. The game you seek is not national it is purly satanic.
I have been saying for decades that as "Cotton was King" funded by the Globalist oeners of Britain = all cotton went to British cotton mills that sold exclusively the cloth monoply they had thruout the world esp thru cheap slave labor cotton producing cloth in their child slave labor factory's;
Just realize the "City of London" banksters owned the British Empire even in 1776, and certainly did own the South monetarily right on thru 1861 in the South and wanted to continue cheap slave labor cotton and extended clear thru California as "Slave States":
Southern white worker classes were just above the black slaves so merely white slave classes beholden to the billionaire plsntation owners who were directly tied to the Globalist owned British industry giants world trade controllers...!
I'VE WRITTEN THIS ALL FOR MANY YRS
The very Globalist's WE kicked out in 1783 also were behind OUR unCivil War to divide and reconquer America economically...!
All this is easily understood once honestly researched...!
The Globalist new main branch offIce became the FED/IRS take over in 1913, to used to fund their setup Euro Civil War to take down Germany-[became WWI (1914) once they inserted their installed POTUS Wilson], while funding Lenin/Stalin to install Communist slavery over the Russian people via Bolshevik-1;
Once Germany was broken in 1918 had their U.S. FED actor's draw up the "Treaty of Versaille" to further crush the German people to accept a " Bolshevik-2 " for their attempted Coup there lasting 15yrs(1918-33) which failed once President Hindenburg appointed Adolf/Nat.Soc. as the 3rd Temprary Chancellor to stop the CommieCoup(I know this attempted over throw for my father was in firefights with those Communist terrorists they paid = just like ANTIFA/BLM here only armed there-> from 1919 to 1928 when he imigrated here, my mother had come here already prior...!
The Nat.Soc. Party headed by adolf only arose because of this concerted effort to take Germany down into Communism so later once armed up Stalin would have a partnership with Germany as Communist's, NOT have to fight them(one which they could never win);
For the plan was Communism for the entire European Continent to usher in their NWO = then America to be taken from within-> already in their incremental setup " Bolshevik-3 " here with in players in place like John Dewey to indoctrinate education and who's system was already used by Stalin;
Then crashed OUR stock market to create an intentional Depression to install their man FDR("friend of Stalin") "The New Deal" an appointed Agency DeepState, confiscate all Gold, install Ponsi SocSec scam by No., and then later their UN on American soil while selling us to the IMF in WWII at Bretton Woods by OUR SocSec No. = total enslavement of the American People cradle to grave...!
A relatively recent book by Anton Chaitkin - 'Who we are' is of interest in connection with the still polarised debate about the civil war. Since several otherwise learned observers seem to me to have got it wrong about Andrew Jackson I recommend this source, Chaitkin writes that Andrew Jackson was the first wholly foreign-owned US president.
He did not conceal that he defended the slave owners.
And likewise Thomas Jefferson. He had 600 slaves
My suspicion is that the angloamerican establishment that Carroll Quigley exposes has played a significant role in maintaining the confusion and omission about the importance of slavery and the libertarians are known to speak well of letting people depend on begging in the steets and not have any social safety nets other than what they get from generous people but where there isnt any legalized social welfair. Like in 19th century Britain
Libertarians point to Britains 1830s as a time when libertarianism worked just fine
The politicians were so powerless that it wasnt any point in bribing them
Carroll Quigleys exposure of the concerned elite group actually having undergone a name change to Pilgrim Society after Cexil Rhodes death merits more attention if one desires to understand what is behind the modern US. Not at all detached from the former colonial master
The 19th century is surprisingly little understood and I believe that is because secret societies like freemasonry dominated by the anglosaxons played a decisive role.
That also entails everything related to the Israel Project and Zionism. Freemasons played a decisive role and the original american freemasons who were the revolutionaries were purged by Palmerston during 1826-1840 resulting in the vanishing of the originally christian patriots and the rise of the Scottish Rite in the US
That period also comprises the year 1833 when Skull and Bones was established.
(Did Palmerston have a hand in that too?)
Skull and Bones had surprisingly many things in common with the british led angloamerican establishment. In my view they both practised Hegelian strategy of creating opposites to foment the sort of crisis that would eventually lead to the welcoming of a world government
Edgar Allan Poe played a role in an effort to spread the revolutionary ideas to Europe but was systematically blackpainted by Britains helpers. A very masonic method to alter history, to conform with the aims of the ruling circles
When it comes to Andrew Jackson I beg to differ. He was in collusion with the slave owners and not at all a champion fighting for the little people like it is sometimes claimed by the so called Jacksonians.
That in my view is an entirely false libertarian myth.
On the contrary he was a traitor. Working for Britain.
The slaveowners and Britain had the aim of weakening the federal power because it was anticipated that a strong federal economy would result in freeing the slaves.
Consequently the slave owners didt want the US federal government to have a strong economy. Thats the ugly truth behind all the nonsense talk about weakening the state.
That is what the libertarians are defending although I dont think they ever come out of the closet about it.
Britain would buy cotton to the manchester industries. During the civil war they also bought from India and Egypt. They would enjoy free trade and on the same time would know they had averted that the US would build a successful industry.
Americans would benefit from dumping libertarianism and to begin uniting the state and the private enterprises to build infrastructure and I think they ought to listen to Jeremy Rifkind
As it seems to me the americans are incredibly ignorant about their own history.
I dont understand how intelligent and responsible americans are willing to live with this annoying situation.
You've some correct, yet Jackson absolutely HATED & despised the BritishEsp. along with the bankster overlords that financed and owned the British Empire for 100yrs already then...!
Jackson also stopped the move of secession by Calhoun in it's tracks;
On his death bed asked of his greatest accomplishments stated "I finally stopped the Central Banks and their monetary control"
As to the bankster's reacquiring us in 1913 and subsequent use of the Atheist MarXist John Dewey to intentionally undermine education here(his corriculum was used by Ghoul Stalin in Soviet Schools), for too deeply knowledgeable Americans would only hinder the Globalist taking total
control here which is required = IF they expect one day to implement their NWO worldwide using Communism as their chosen tool to do it;
https://www.marxists.org/subject/art/literature/children/ref/gov/gov1.html
Andrew Jackson played into the hands of the British so when people believe Jackson's hatred of the British was decisive it helped the British to manipulate the US in Britains favour. Jackson like all politicians are actors.
One of the more popular acts the British employ is to paint the picture that the Rothschilds are pulling the strings behind the scenes. Jews like Disraeli were employed to spread this impression and was rewarded with becoming Britains prime minister.
But that doesnt mean Disraeli was right. The bankers are allowed influence over imperial finances in return for lojalty. There are no genuine international bankers
The thing about the early american national banking was that it enabled the US to start building infrastructure by allowing foreign bankers to gain profits but not to control the banks. Any arrangement where foreign bankers would have been treated like a den of vipers would of course have turned them away from the win-win Hamilton knew was necessary.
Concerning NWO it is part of the Skull and Bones groups agenda as well as part of the Cecil Rhodes groups agenda that was renamed to Pilgrim Society after Rhodes death.
This aim for a world government in the hands of the anglosaxons means they want the big rival countries to be manouevered by collectivist leaders. Socialist collectivists vs fascist collectivists in a polarised world that would eventually beg the anglosaxons to solve the conflict with their world government.
There never was any independent communism in the east nor in the west.
The US Army aided the bolshevisk to power and 'the reds thanked their american friends for having saved their movement in a difficult moment'. In the case of General Graves army it was about preventing the Japanese from taking the transibirian railway.
The British army promised Lenin not to give the white armies enough help if Lenin would assassinate the Tsar and all subseequent heirs and in addition to sink the fleet.
The situation in China had some other elements for example Chiang Kai Chek collaborated with the japanese that the US was fighting. Bit of a problem.
But the YMCA offered Maos adepts a training ground in their 'Christian' localities
americans4innovation have written informatively about that
But significantly - Bertrand Russel and the John Dewey you mention were very clear about preventing a capitalist China from Rising.
Stalin predicted in 1930 that they would be attacked in a decade so nothing to do but to industrialise. The anglosaxons mounted gold bockades to prevent the Soviets from importing machinery paid in gold. Howevere they were allowed to pay in grain.
This despite the fact that there was plenty of grain on the world market.
As it turned out draught happened but the anglosaxons were happy about the Soviets having to starve to pay british and american machines.
The Hurst press used this in the propaganda to demonise the Soviets.
At home in the US there was depression and the working class was suffering.
Hence red scare that Hurst battled.
so the Holodomor meme was much wanted by the oligarchy
It was all about anglosaxon imperialism
"Time is the fire in which we burn." Folks, we are running out of time to make changes and take action that can restore our Constitutional government and the American way of life.
Just wake up to the fact Stalin genocided 20million of his own thru 1932, Adolf wasn’t even appointed the 3rd•Temp till ‘33;
By 1941 Ghoul Stalin + murdering Soviet murdered another 20million of his own and invaded 6 nations YET all that talked about is Adolf, and none have a clue as WHY & HOW he even was there because they’ve actually no idea rooted in the truth;
Stalin made a piker of Adolf’s entire later career before Adolf was even in the scene as a Temp. is 33, let alone the 100million he helped slaughter before the monster finally croaked his last:
It would seem that diligent persons might want to understand the real history of what went on in the lead up directly because of U.S. when in wrong involvement or no involvement when it should have;
Instead of the Globalist funded U.S. Big Ed. tells them what to regurgitate as whatever they’re told to, It is wearying trying to connect folks with what was 80+% ommitted as is in ALL Fake News & U.S. Educational Globalist outlets…!
Seems people would be ready to connect real dots drawing the true bigger picture which is 180° of what's been told to think and regurgitation as taught:
Globalist new main branch offIce the FED/IRS take over in 1913, funded their setup Euro Civil War to take down Germany-[to became WWI (1914) once they inserted their installed puppet Wilson], while funding Lenin/Stalin to install Communist slavery over the Russian people via Bolshevik-1;
Once Germany was broken in 1918 had their U.S. FED actor's draw up the "Treaty of Versaille" to further crush the German people to accept a " Bolshevik-2 " for their attempted Coup there lasting 15yrs(1918-33) which failed once President Hindenburg appointed Adolf/Nat.Soc. as the 3rd Temprary Chancellor to stop this Commie Coup = my own father was in firefights with those Globalist bankster paid Communist terrorists just as are ANTIFA/BLM here, only then they were armed there-> from 1919 to 1928 then he imigrated here, my mother had come already prior...!
The Nat.Soc. Party headed by Adolf sadly only arose because of this concerted effort to take Germany down into Communism via a Bolshevik-2 so then later once armed up Stalin would have a partnership with Germany as both Communist's, NOT have to fight them(one which they could never win);
For the plan was Communism for the entire European Continent to usher in their NWO = then America to be taken from within-> already in their incremental setup " Bolshevik-3 " here with in players in place like John Dewey to indoctrinate education and who's system was already used by Ghoul Stalin in Soviet schools;
Then in '29 crashed OUR stock market to create an intentional Depression to install their man FDR("friend of Stalin") "The New Deal" an appointed Agency DeepState, confiscate all Gold, install Ponsi SocSec scam by No., and then later their UN on American soil while selling us to the IMF in WWII at Bretton Woods by OUR SocSec No. = total enslavement of the American People cradle to grave...!
https://www.marxists.org/subject/art/literature/children/ref/gov/gov1.html
You are obsessed by one particular communist rebel at least partly trained in London who eventually managed to prevent Britains evil plans to use the USSR as one component in NWO led by the anglosaxons.
Like Richard Poe tells us about the american civil war he also tells us about how the british was behind the spread of communism.
You didnt comment about what I said about the US/UKs assistance for putting communism in power in both Russia and China
I now add that the americans definitely put both Castro and the Sandinistas in power so the US was behind communism there to!
It is weird how anglosaxons go on with their mantra about megadeath by others but simultaneously omit how they themselves were instrumental in causing it
Both through financing and through deliberate Hegelian strategy aiming towards the NWO the anglosaxons have been after ever since the anglosaxons caused the 'French' revolution.
As long as you refer to those you think rule the world as globalists without explaining that every part of it goes back to the anglosaxon elite societies to which all the bankers are subservient you are either an agent of influence or a puppet for those anglosaxon elites and their preferred narrative.
Wake up and go beyond the meagre historical narrative that omits them!
Carroll Quigley did an effort to explain what was going on but was largely frosen out of his career.
It is too simple to misdirect people by just not giving authors fair credit.
With Anthony Sutton there was the additional complexity associated with Nixons generous deal with the Soviets in order to make them shut up about the nonexistent american manned space program.
It falls on you and other part-info's IF you want to expand your stuck limited grasp of real history in the true bigger historical picture by personal due diligence to research the connections to see that picture = not up to me to slow down to spoon fed those stuck in a cul de sac to backtrack & get on moving forward...!
I don't have the time to waste anymore...!
You dont explain anything by that answer and I think you may find - if you try - that real history isnt what you thought. The powerful angloamerican establishment like its oligarchic forebears often was on both sides. I find it annoying that this important aspect is often overlooked.
Brilliant. Thanks. I'm fortunate to have known you. Best wishes to Marie.
A lot of history here that I was not aware of but I cannot understand how such an ostensibly detailed account the of the Civil War could have no mention of how Lincoln funded the war, no mention of money or the greenbacks despite mentions of Henry Carey, Lincoln's chief economic advisor and propoenent of issueing the greenbacks, without which the Union would have lost the war.