Truly a brilliant article that is both eye opening and sobering, lending a fresh perspective on the historical background of current situation in the Ukraine and the complex British-Russian relationship. Rarely have I read an essay that has opened my mind to such an extent regarding modern history. Many thanks for this work.
An excellent, comprehensive and well-sourced essay covering this period in history. I must say that I was unaware of much of what is disclosed here, especially of the role that Great Britain played in all of this. Thank you.
Where to begin....this is a huge white wash of the role of the Rothschilds and the jewish banking elites, in all the events described. It focuses on the strategic events and not the money and motivations behind the scenes. I recommend the book 'A History of Central Banking and the Enslavement of Mankind' by Stephen Mitford Goodson, to understand the money power behind the world events described. An audio version is available on Bitchute.
“Some call it Communism; I call it Judaism.” — Pro-Communist, “Red Rabbi” Stephen Wise, advisor to Presidents Wilson and F.D.R., when asked in 1935 by a reporter to comment on Communism. Wise, a staunch Jewish supremacist, was also known as a “Father of Zionism” for his help in securing the Zionist Balfour Declaration, thus another representation of how Communism (just like neoconservatism) originated as a Trojan Horse for Jewish supremacism in America !!!
.
“The Jewish serpent will show its hydra’s heads everywhere, blocking the way to a relaxation of international tensions. We Jews will not allow peace in the world, however hard statesmen and peace advocates try to bring it about.”
— London Jewish Chronicle, March 3, 1939
.
“Judaism and Communism are one and the same.” ~ HILARY COTTER, author of Cardinal Minszenty, The Truth About His Real “Crime,” page 6
.
“Communism is Judaism. The Jewish Bolshevik Revolution in 1917 Russia.” ~ H.H. BEAMISH, N.Y. speech, 1937 (“The Secret Force” by Maurice Pinay) !!!
.
“The Jew is an inborn communist”! Otto Weininger, a Jew, Sex & Character, pp 311 !
.
“Zionism is Judaism, and Judaism is unthinkable without Zionism.” (Harper’s Encyclopedia of United States History, Vol. X, “Zionists”).
.
“Some call it Marxism (Communism), I call it Judaism.” – Rabbi Stephen Samuel Wise – The American Bulletin, May 5, 1935. (Judaism is nothing but disguised, camouflaged Communism, therefore, Zionism is nothing but Communism) !!!
.
“Bolshevism and Communism, were Jewish proposed, Jewish financed, Jewish led and Jewish operated. The most muderous regime this planet has ever known, was Jewish through & through.” ~ (“The Secret Force” by Maurice Pinay) !!!
.
Theodore Herzl, one of the Jewish founders of Zionism, on the Judeo-fascist question:
“The Jews control the world, in our hands lies the fate of governments and nations. The Jews set governments one against the other. When the Jews play, the nations and the rulers dance. One way or the other, the Jewish Race gets rich.”
The conflict of Judaism with Christianity –
.
Jewish supremacist rabbi, Harry Waton, confessed that not only is Communism Jewish, but that it is simply a mechanism for Jewish world dominion and the subjugation of all non-Jews — a fulfillment of the megalomaniacal messianic vision of the Torah and the Talmud. In his 1939 book, “A Program for The Jews and An Answer To All Anti-Semites: A Program for Humanity”, the racist rabbi wrote:
.
“It is not an accident that Judaism gave birth to Marxism, and it is not an accident that the Jews readily took up Marxism; all this was in perfect accord with the progress of Judaism and the Jews. The Jews should realize that Jehovah no longer dwells in heaven, but he dwells in us right here on earth; we must no longer look up to Jehovah as above us and outside of us, but we must see him right within us,” (p. 148) “Since the Jews are the highest and most cultured people on earth, the Jews have a right to subordinate to themselves the rest of mankind and to be the masters over the whole earth. Now, indeed, this is the historic destiny of the Jews,” (p. 99) “Judaism is communism, internationalism, the universal brotherhood of man, the emancipation of the working class and the human society. It is with these spiritual weapons that the Jews will conquer the world and the human race.” (p. 100) [pdf 2012 Feb] The Jew World Order Unmasked
.
Matthew 20:27 Context
.
24And when the ten heard it, they were moved with indignation against the two brethren. 25But Jesus called them unto him, and said, Ye know that the princes of the Gentiles exercise dominion over them, and they that are great exercise authority upon them. 26But it shall not be so among you: but whosoever will be great among you, let him be your minister; 27And whosoever will be chief among you, let him be your servant: 28Even as the Son of man came not to be ministered unto, but to minister, and to give his life a ransom for many. 29And as they departed from Jericho, a great multitude followed him. 30And, behold, two blind men sitting by the way side, when they heard that Jesus passed by, cried out, saying, Have mercy on us, O Lord, thou Son of David.
.
The "Jews" were a mixture of Canaanites, Edomites (Herod was an Edomite) and others, but Christ was a pure blood of the tribe of Judah. The inscription written over Him meant "This is the King of the tribe of Judah". Luke 23:38 Moultons Greek Dictionary.
.
Spitting Superstitions
Spitting, according to Pliny, was superstitiously observed in averting witchcraft and in giving a shrewder blow to an enemy.
‘……………Spitting on Palestinians is now de rigueur. Business as usual. Sadism on a grand scale. Whence the motivation? And the collective psychological reward? The Jewish God is a militant deity………….”
Then they spat on Him, and took the reed and struck Him on the head. And when they had mocked Him, they took the robe off Him, put His own clothes on Him, and led Him away to be crucified." Mark 15:16-20 NKJV "Then the soldiers led Him away into the hall called Praetorium, and they called together the whole garrison. And they clothed Him with purple; and they twisted a crown of thorns, put ...
Matthew 27:30-31
30 They spat on Jesus. Then they took his ·stick [reed; staff] and began to beat him on the head. 31 After they ·finished [had mocked him], the soldiers took off the robe and put his own clothes on him again. Then they led him away to be crucified.
Essentially if you follow your narrative, the British aimed to overthrow itself.
If you conclude Semitic's had a major role, it seems you're basically levying the same accusation but in reverse. In hindsight it seems this did not go as planned: whatever coordination or pretext for aggressions is besides the point. Because the results were not in the interests of the British. Karl Marx and his ilk had the hatred for the Tsar's. It was not the British. I would instead suggest it was Marx, using the British government, to further his own plans.
I first listened to your recent conversation with Tom Luongo, and then read this article. This historical view was reflected in Hidden History by Docherty and MacGregor, and also Antony Sutton's Wall Street and the Bolshevik Revolution. Also, the historians in the LaRouche camp, like Matt Ehret and Anton Chaitkin have clued me into the British role in the French Revolution and other aspects of British malfeasance. I am very glad to have discovered your work which complements these others very well.
An amazing interpretation of history but, unfortunately, that is all it is.
Constantly blaming 'the British' indicates an ignorance of the influence of the City of London based Venetian Black Nobility that is so astonishing that it must be contrived deliberately to conceal the truth. How sad.
Further - Communism originated in Paraguay under the Jesuits and was perfected slowly for 200 years before being taught to Jesuit educated Marx. Needless to say the Jesuits are also under the influence of the Venetian Black Nobility to this day.
Hi Richard, Great to discover you on Substack. I have been a fan of your work for some time and been busy reading my way through your insightful work. Particularly about how the western (fascist) capitalists created communism. Do you have any essays on the links of the Anglo-American empire to the creation of communism in China? And any insights into what they were trying to achieve? From where I sit it looks like they used the CCP to take down the old power structure, and to utterly impoverish the people and set the stage for Henry Kissinger to open China up and flood it with foreign capital, technology and skills to raise China up and suck out the wealth from the western world, and divert it to both China, and into the bank accounts of the World Economic Forum's cartels corporations in tax havens, in order to wage economic and social warfare on the world by using their neo-monarchies the global institutions and swamp around the UN. The Roman Empires global fascists are at it again.
There are definitely some interesting points raised in this article especially about the strange outcome of the Russian civil war and entire the Gallipoli affair - as well as Marx’s ties to the British Establishment. But I’m afraid that you do not make a persuasive case for Britain being behind the SOVIET revolution of October 1917 and completely ignore all of the evidence for Jewish overrepresentation (at the very least) in this movement.
To start with I don’t think that the article makes it sufficiently clear that there were TWO separate revolutions in 1917- one in February that put the ‘Provisional’ government’ in power and one in October which replaced it with Lenin’s Bolsheviks. The geopolitical influence of Britain behind the first does, indeed, seem clear but is tenuous, at best, for the second. Yet your article gives the impression these were one single event. For example it suggests that Trotsky might have been a British agent and then suggests that this was the reason that he repudiated Russia’s prior treaties and territorial claims (as part of the Brest-Litovsk agreement with the Germans).
But the revolution that placed Trotsky in power wasn’t the February one backed by Britain but the October one which was backed by the germans NOT the British. In fact the British clearly had a geopolitical interest in keeping the Provisional Government or at least something like it in power as the Bolsheviks promised to withdraw Russia from the war completely, removing the need for Germany to fight on two fronts and potentially risking total British defeat in WW1 - which a British controlled government would certainly never have done.
The other problem with the argument is that whilst highlighting possible British support for the network of freemasons and liberals who led the FIRST revolution in (who, as I said, were not at all the same as Bolsheviks and actually fought against them in many cases) it completely ignores the PROVEN involvement of many Jews in the latter.
To name just a few - Maxim Litvinov (ambassador minister of foreign affairs), Lev Kamenev (key ally of Stalin), Zioniviev (key ally of Stalin, advocate of mass terror), Genrikh Yagoda (head of secret police), Moisei Uritsky (head of secret police), Lazar Kaganovich (key architect of Ukrainian famine), Naftaly Frenkel (architect, with Yagoda, of the Gulag Slave Labour prison system), Jakov Sverdlov (influential early Bolshevik who formulated policy of terror against peasants before his death) and many, many others…
(Of course Stalin later seemed to ‘turn on’ many of these people but, in the period of Lenin’s rule and before Stalin had assumed total power they preached and executed mass terror against the Russian population without any apparent external pressure to do so).
Besides this when subsequent revolutions break out on the ’Soviet’ model - such as that of Bela Kuhn in Hungary - we find Jewish individuals once more to be massively overrepresented in the key organs of power, especially in the hated security services that were responsible for the systematic murder of anyone who posed a threat to them (and specifically the old, Christian elite i.e teachers, priests, patriotic and liberal intelligentsia etc) which is precisely the same thing we find in the Soviet government itself during this period (and was a major part of the reason there was such a backlash against the Jewish community across Europe in the years that followed). These are historical facts, even if they have subsequently become controversial.
Now I certainly think that Britain’s (and even more so Germany’s) irresponsible geopolitical brinksmanship and meddling played a major role in the overall deterioration of Russia and the rise to power of Lenin. I also agree that certain groups in the British ruling class and intelligentsia almost certainly desired the kind of nihilistic, slave-labour regime that arose in Russia and used their influence to back it internationally afterwards - as did many ‘progressive’ Americans as well, including President Roosevelt himself.
But I’m afraid that the evidence you have provided does not at all prove that Britain was uniquely or even largely responsible for the rise of Communism in Russia nor that the Jewish community (or at the very least a radical section of it) was a mere scapegoat that took no active part in the Bolshevik conspiracy and later dictatorship. On the other hand you have left out a lot of other evidence that suggests that a disproportionate number of Jewish individuals willing took part in both the revolution itself and the mass terror that followed.
I'm bookmarking to finish it. Very lengthy but it's a fascinating story. So the question then becomes "Who controls British intelligence?" doesn't it? The Rothschild's would be my bet given that Victor served in the intelligence service (I'm sure it was just love of king and country, LOL).
It is interesting watching the Jews get used as a shield (shout anti-semite at everyone who questions us/you) and thrown under the bus by the Zionists (The old shall have to suffer their fate. We don't need them for the Palestine project). You would hope they would catch on and refuse to go along. Sadly I'm afraid that most Jews still are not aware of the danger their own leaders have put them in:
Your work is very important, thank you. But you need to edit the many repetitions and eliminate them. I have done this myself, so I understand, but eliminating those will make your message more powerful.
Excellent indeed. But as a person of Slavic decent, I find the statement of the hatred of Slavs vs Jews troubling. In all my years and family relationships I've never encountered that sentiment. On the other hand, the article is an example of what we may again be experiencing today and that's very troubling. The current wars, the last ten in Ukraine and its color revolution are in my mind connected, and the same players are once again involved. Same with Israel. I was surprised that the "Constantine Treaty" was just before Sykes Picot, or are they the same? A line I read recently comes to mind. The U.S. is the ravenous wolf collard and leashed by the British. Is that what's going on today? So vile and so sick, the idea that we're a "free people" seems like total nonsense.
Truly a brilliant article that is both eye opening and sobering, lending a fresh perspective on the historical background of current situation in the Ukraine and the complex British-Russian relationship. Rarely have I read an essay that has opened my mind to such an extent regarding modern history. Many thanks for this work.
An excellent, comprehensive and well-sourced essay covering this period in history. I must say that I was unaware of much of what is disclosed here, especially of the role that Great Britain played in all of this. Thank you.
Where to begin....this is a huge white wash of the role of the Rothschilds and the jewish banking elites, in all the events described. It focuses on the strategic events and not the money and motivations behind the scenes. I recommend the book 'A History of Central Banking and the Enslavement of Mankind' by Stephen Mitford Goodson, to understand the money power behind the world events described. An audio version is available on Bitchute.
“Some call it Communism; I call it Judaism.” — Pro-Communist, “Red Rabbi” Stephen Wise, advisor to Presidents Wilson and F.D.R., when asked in 1935 by a reporter to comment on Communism. Wise, a staunch Jewish supremacist, was also known as a “Father of Zionism” for his help in securing the Zionist Balfour Declaration, thus another representation of how Communism (just like neoconservatism) originated as a Trojan Horse for Jewish supremacism in America !!!
.
“The Jewish serpent will show its hydra’s heads everywhere, blocking the way to a relaxation of international tensions. We Jews will not allow peace in the world, however hard statesmen and peace advocates try to bring it about.”
— London Jewish Chronicle, March 3, 1939
.
“Judaism and Communism are one and the same.” ~ HILARY COTTER, author of Cardinal Minszenty, The Truth About His Real “Crime,” page 6
.
“Communism is Judaism. The Jewish Bolshevik Revolution in 1917 Russia.” ~ H.H. BEAMISH, N.Y. speech, 1937 (“The Secret Force” by Maurice Pinay) !!!
.
“The Jew is an inborn communist”! Otto Weininger, a Jew, Sex & Character, pp 311 !
.
“Zionism is Judaism, and Judaism is unthinkable without Zionism.” (Harper’s Encyclopedia of United States History, Vol. X, “Zionists”).
.
“Some call it Marxism (Communism), I call it Judaism.” – Rabbi Stephen Samuel Wise – The American Bulletin, May 5, 1935. (Judaism is nothing but disguised, camouflaged Communism, therefore, Zionism is nothing but Communism) !!!
.
“Bolshevism and Communism, were Jewish proposed, Jewish financed, Jewish led and Jewish operated. The most muderous regime this planet has ever known, was Jewish through & through.” ~ (“The Secret Force” by Maurice Pinay) !!!
.
Theodore Herzl, one of the Jewish founders of Zionism, on the Judeo-fascist question:
“The Jews control the world, in our hands lies the fate of governments and nations. The Jews set governments one against the other. When the Jews play, the nations and the rulers dance. One way or the other, the Jewish Race gets rich.”
The conflict of Judaism with Christianity –
.
Jewish supremacist rabbi, Harry Waton, confessed that not only is Communism Jewish, but that it is simply a mechanism for Jewish world dominion and the subjugation of all non-Jews — a fulfillment of the megalomaniacal messianic vision of the Torah and the Talmud. In his 1939 book, “A Program for The Jews and An Answer To All Anti-Semites: A Program for Humanity”, the racist rabbi wrote:
.
“It is not an accident that Judaism gave birth to Marxism, and it is not an accident that the Jews readily took up Marxism; all this was in perfect accord with the progress of Judaism and the Jews. The Jews should realize that Jehovah no longer dwells in heaven, but he dwells in us right here on earth; we must no longer look up to Jehovah as above us and outside of us, but we must see him right within us,” (p. 148) “Since the Jews are the highest and most cultured people on earth, the Jews have a right to subordinate to themselves the rest of mankind and to be the masters over the whole earth. Now, indeed, this is the historic destiny of the Jews,” (p. 99) “Judaism is communism, internationalism, the universal brotherhood of man, the emancipation of the working class and the human society. It is with these spiritual weapons that the Jews will conquer the world and the human race.” (p. 100) [pdf 2012 Feb] The Jew World Order Unmasked
.
Matthew 20:27 Context
.
24And when the ten heard it, they were moved with indignation against the two brethren. 25But Jesus called them unto him, and said, Ye know that the princes of the Gentiles exercise dominion over them, and they that are great exercise authority upon them. 26But it shall not be so among you: but whosoever will be great among you, let him be your minister; 27And whosoever will be chief among you, let him be your servant: 28Even as the Son of man came not to be ministered unto, but to minister, and to give his life a ransom for many. 29And as they departed from Jericho, a great multitude followed him. 30And, behold, two blind men sitting by the way side, when they heard that Jesus passed by, cried out, saying, Have mercy on us, O Lord, thou Son of David.
.
The "Jews" were a mixture of Canaanites, Edomites (Herod was an Edomite) and others, but Christ was a pure blood of the tribe of Judah. The inscription written over Him meant "This is the King of the tribe of Judah". Luke 23:38 Moultons Greek Dictionary.
.
Spitting Superstitions
Spitting, according to Pliny, was superstitiously observed in averting witchcraft and in giving a shrewder blow to an enemy.
Read the post
http://www.renegadetribune.com/spitting-superstitions/
‘……………Spitting on Palestinians is now de rigueur. Business as usual. Sadism on a grand scale. Whence the motivation? And the collective psychological reward? The Jewish God is a militant deity………….”
https://ahtribune.com/world/4105-israel-and-world-jewry.html
Then they spat on Him, and took the reed and struck Him on the head. And when they had mocked Him, they took the robe off Him, put His own clothes on Him, and led Him away to be crucified." Mark 15:16-20 NKJV "Then the soldiers led Him away into the hall called Praetorium, and they called together the whole garrison. And they clothed Him with purple; and they twisted a crown of thorns, put ...
Matthew 27:30-31
30 They spat on Jesus. Then they took his ·stick [reed; staff] and began to beat him on the head. 31 After they ·finished [had mocked him], the soldiers took off the robe and put his own clothes on him again. Then they led him away to be crucified.
Historically, this makes little sense to me.
Essentially if you follow your narrative, the British aimed to overthrow itself.
If you conclude Semitic's had a major role, it seems you're basically levying the same accusation but in reverse. In hindsight it seems this did not go as planned: whatever coordination or pretext for aggressions is besides the point. Because the results were not in the interests of the British. Karl Marx and his ilk had the hatred for the Tsar's. It was not the British. I would instead suggest it was Marx, using the British government, to further his own plans.
I first listened to your recent conversation with Tom Luongo, and then read this article. This historical view was reflected in Hidden History by Docherty and MacGregor, and also Antony Sutton's Wall Street and the Bolshevik Revolution. Also, the historians in the LaRouche camp, like Matt Ehret and Anton Chaitkin have clued me into the British role in the French Revolution and other aspects of British malfeasance. I am very glad to have discovered your work which complements these others very well.
An amazing interpretation of history but, unfortunately, that is all it is.
Constantly blaming 'the British' indicates an ignorance of the influence of the City of London based Venetian Black Nobility that is so astonishing that it must be contrived deliberately to conceal the truth. How sad.
Further - Communism originated in Paraguay under the Jesuits and was perfected slowly for 200 years before being taught to Jesuit educated Marx. Needless to say the Jesuits are also under the influence of the Venetian Black Nobility to this day.
https://francesleader.substack.com/p/black-nobility-101
Hi Richard, Great to discover you on Substack. I have been a fan of your work for some time and been busy reading my way through your insightful work. Particularly about how the western (fascist) capitalists created communism. Do you have any essays on the links of the Anglo-American empire to the creation of communism in China? And any insights into what they were trying to achieve? From where I sit it looks like they used the CCP to take down the old power structure, and to utterly impoverish the people and set the stage for Henry Kissinger to open China up and flood it with foreign capital, technology and skills to raise China up and suck out the wealth from the western world, and divert it to both China, and into the bank accounts of the World Economic Forum's cartels corporations in tax havens, in order to wage economic and social warfare on the world by using their neo-monarchies the global institutions and swamp around the UN. The Roman Empires global fascists are at it again.
Ivan
Thank you Mr Poe for all of your work, and especially for sharing it with us here on substack in such great detail and depth.
I am extremely grateful for these insights and hope that your writing may reach as great an audience as possible.
Wow...just wow!!! So good!
Well researched article BUT you have a blind spot for Jewish power. Have a look at "The nameless war" by Cap. Archibald Maule Ramsay
https://archive.org/details/the-nameless-war-captain-archibald-maule-ramsay/page/n97/mode/2up
There are definitely some interesting points raised in this article especially about the strange outcome of the Russian civil war and entire the Gallipoli affair - as well as Marx’s ties to the British Establishment. But I’m afraid that you do not make a persuasive case for Britain being behind the SOVIET revolution of October 1917 and completely ignore all of the evidence for Jewish overrepresentation (at the very least) in this movement.
To start with I don’t think that the article makes it sufficiently clear that there were TWO separate revolutions in 1917- one in February that put the ‘Provisional’ government’ in power and one in October which replaced it with Lenin’s Bolsheviks. The geopolitical influence of Britain behind the first does, indeed, seem clear but is tenuous, at best, for the second. Yet your article gives the impression these were one single event. For example it suggests that Trotsky might have been a British agent and then suggests that this was the reason that he repudiated Russia’s prior treaties and territorial claims (as part of the Brest-Litovsk agreement with the Germans).
But the revolution that placed Trotsky in power wasn’t the February one backed by Britain but the October one which was backed by the germans NOT the British. In fact the British clearly had a geopolitical interest in keeping the Provisional Government or at least something like it in power as the Bolsheviks promised to withdraw Russia from the war completely, removing the need for Germany to fight on two fronts and potentially risking total British defeat in WW1 - which a British controlled government would certainly never have done.
The other problem with the argument is that whilst highlighting possible British support for the network of freemasons and liberals who led the FIRST revolution in (who, as I said, were not at all the same as Bolsheviks and actually fought against them in many cases) it completely ignores the PROVEN involvement of many Jews in the latter.
To name just a few - Maxim Litvinov (ambassador minister of foreign affairs), Lev Kamenev (key ally of Stalin), Zioniviev (key ally of Stalin, advocate of mass terror), Genrikh Yagoda (head of secret police), Moisei Uritsky (head of secret police), Lazar Kaganovich (key architect of Ukrainian famine), Naftaly Frenkel (architect, with Yagoda, of the Gulag Slave Labour prison system), Jakov Sverdlov (influential early Bolshevik who formulated policy of terror against peasants before his death) and many, many others…
(Of course Stalin later seemed to ‘turn on’ many of these people but, in the period of Lenin’s rule and before Stalin had assumed total power they preached and executed mass terror against the Russian population without any apparent external pressure to do so).
Besides this when subsequent revolutions break out on the ’Soviet’ model - such as that of Bela Kuhn in Hungary - we find Jewish individuals once more to be massively overrepresented in the key organs of power, especially in the hated security services that were responsible for the systematic murder of anyone who posed a threat to them (and specifically the old, Christian elite i.e teachers, priests, patriotic and liberal intelligentsia etc) which is precisely the same thing we find in the Soviet government itself during this period (and was a major part of the reason there was such a backlash against the Jewish community across Europe in the years that followed). These are historical facts, even if they have subsequently become controversial.
Now I certainly think that Britain’s (and even more so Germany’s) irresponsible geopolitical brinksmanship and meddling played a major role in the overall deterioration of Russia and the rise to power of Lenin. I also agree that certain groups in the British ruling class and intelligentsia almost certainly desired the kind of nihilistic, slave-labour regime that arose in Russia and used their influence to back it internationally afterwards - as did many ‘progressive’ Americans as well, including President Roosevelt himself.
But I’m afraid that the evidence you have provided does not at all prove that Britain was uniquely or even largely responsible for the rise of Communism in Russia nor that the Jewish community (or at the very least a radical section of it) was a mere scapegoat that took no active part in the Bolshevik conspiracy and later dictatorship. On the other hand you have left out a lot of other evidence that suggests that a disproportionate number of Jewish individuals willing took part in both the revolution itself and the mass terror that followed.
I'm bookmarking to finish it. Very lengthy but it's a fascinating story. So the question then becomes "Who controls British intelligence?" doesn't it? The Rothschild's would be my bet given that Victor served in the intelligence service (I'm sure it was just love of king and country, LOL).
It is interesting watching the Jews get used as a shield (shout anti-semite at everyone who questions us/you) and thrown under the bus by the Zionists (The old shall have to suffer their fate. We don't need them for the Palestine project). You would hope they would catch on and refuse to go along. Sadly I'm afraid that most Jews still are not aware of the danger their own leaders have put them in:
https://i.postimg.cc/8zdNzFyQ/Israel-Netanyahu-Bennett-Bourla.png
I'm afraid they are going under the bus again.
Your work is very important, thank you. But you need to edit the many repetitions and eliminate them. I have done this myself, so I understand, but eliminating those will make your message more powerful.
The Jews and the British Empire - Lesley Fry (1935)
https://archive.org/details/FRYLesleyTheJewsAndTheBritishEmpire1935/page/n1/mode/2up
Excellent indeed. But as a person of Slavic decent, I find the statement of the hatred of Slavs vs Jews troubling. In all my years and family relationships I've never encountered that sentiment. On the other hand, the article is an example of what we may again be experiencing today and that's very troubling. The current wars, the last ten in Ukraine and its color revolution are in my mind connected, and the same players are once again involved. Same with Israel. I was surprised that the "Constantine Treaty" was just before Sykes Picot, or are they the same? A line I read recently comes to mind. The U.S. is the ravenous wolf collard and leashed by the British. Is that what's going on today? So vile and so sick, the idea that we're a "free people" seems like total nonsense.