If we decide to let the Jews off the hook and retaliate against the British instead, I don’t see that as solving any problems. It’s the Jew we need to get off our backs. In this example some of these Jews are in Britain and in the City Of London.
Think of another of your examples. If Trotsky is a British agent and controlled By MI6 then this audit trail may still lead back to the City and to the Rothschilds so it doesn’t tell us that letting the Jews off the hook and blaming the British has much value.
He seems to come with all the receipts to the level of an Anthony Sutton. So it goes beyond standard conspiracy theory where you get pretty good circumstantial evidence but not quite enough to pin your wagon to it.
But we want to see how much these English elites were in the Jewish creditors pockets. That’s taking another step back and I don’t feel like the work has been done. We certainly have that for Churchill. But I expect the Jews would have flooded the zone and had a file on all these estate owning dandies.
Shenanigans seems to go hand in hand with thalassocracy. The ports and canals are built. This brings the extended structure of production which makes technological innovation not just possible but readily applied. But at this point the usurers and schemers show up. And they have to project their intrigue right into the royal families else why should a Prince with an army ever pay them back?
So you had Carthage, Venice, Britain then the US. All a bunch of high tech schemers. I wonder if the Venetian bankers didn’t catalyse both the Mongols and the Plague.
Oligarchy is inevitable but oligarchy without downward mobility is where we get this rampant mouse utopia behaviour.
Yes! well written, I've long suspected that the crash was intentional (I think it was part of a process to justify parliament "freeing" the boe), but I would note that regarding jp morgan (the man) the relationship between him and the City evolved over time, the City's finance (there were dutch too) was very important (although much important stuff was actually local, especially for the thirty years after Andrew Jackson's victory where we had localized monetary policy) and morgan was a key intermediary, but then the relationship evolved as america grew far richer and he made big moves within it to become super powerful, and at then they were quite equal, but then he just became this international force in his own right an eventually he was actually the senior partner and one of the most internationally powerful men in history (although its little know because of how left our of history it is, but he and other but him quite a lot, had actially been weakened a whole lot within usa internally after a large number of events during the co called populist and progressive eras, so called because no one called them that at the time and their misrepresented, with most of the big action happening in the early 20c)
Richard's latest book on the British origins of Communism is utterly amazing, and I am very glad he has put more for us to read online 🫡 I hope he collaborates more with Alex Benesch, who writes along similar themes from the German perspective.
Saw you on MelK. I was enthralled.
I’ll never know even a tiny bit of the stuff I wish I’d know.
Thank you
(I have your book with Horowitz. I will definitely read it now)
That’s where I saw him!
Mel K.
Thank you
Kushner is a POS.
Mel has documentation on all she talks about.
Been booted off YouTube, Twitter, demonetized.
So no. Not believing the Mel K.
Thank you on Kushner article.
No article on how the British led to the downfall of the Roman Empire?
If we decide to let the Jews off the hook and retaliate against the British instead, I don’t see that as solving any problems. It’s the Jew we need to get off our backs. In this example some of these Jews are in Britain and in the City Of London.
Think of another of your examples. If Trotsky is a British agent and controlled By MI6 then this audit trail may still lead back to the City and to the Rothschilds so it doesn’t tell us that letting the Jews off the hook and blaming the British has much value.
Still your histories are extremely interesting.
Poe is interesting for sure. I hope he will read a three volume book, The Jewish Revolutionary Spirit: its impact on history. Maybe write a review.
By the way, when Ukraine started firing missiles into Russia, Putin said his first retaliatory missile would be addressed to London.
We knew exactly what he was thinking.
He seems to come with all the receipts to the level of an Anthony Sutton. So it goes beyond standard conspiracy theory where you get pretty good circumstantial evidence but not quite enough to pin your wagon to it.
But we want to see how much these English elites were in the Jewish creditors pockets. That’s taking another step back and I don’t feel like the work has been done. We certainly have that for Churchill. But I expect the Jews would have flooded the zone and had a file on all these estate owning dandies.
You make good points.
The book I referenced above opened my eyes to British perfidy in European affairs. I’m being vague intentionally.
Shenanigans seems to go hand in hand with thalassocracy. The ports and canals are built. This brings the extended structure of production which makes technological innovation not just possible but readily applied. But at this point the usurers and schemers show up. And they have to project their intrigue right into the royal families else why should a Prince with an army ever pay them back?
So you had Carthage, Venice, Britain then the US. All a bunch of high tech schemers. I wonder if the Venetian bankers didn’t catalyse both the Mongols and the Plague.
Oligarchy is inevitable but oligarchy without downward mobility is where we get this rampant mouse utopia behaviour.
Yes! well written, I've long suspected that the crash was intentional (I think it was part of a process to justify parliament "freeing" the boe), but I would note that regarding jp morgan (the man) the relationship between him and the City evolved over time, the City's finance (there were dutch too) was very important (although much important stuff was actually local, especially for the thirty years after Andrew Jackson's victory where we had localized monetary policy) and morgan was a key intermediary, but then the relationship evolved as america grew far richer and he made big moves within it to become super powerful, and at then they were quite equal, but then he just became this international force in his own right an eventually he was actually the senior partner and one of the most internationally powerful men in history (although its little know because of how left our of history it is, but he and other but him quite a lot, had actially been weakened a whole lot within usa internally after a large number of events during the co called populist and progressive eras, so called because no one called them that at the time and their misrepresented, with most of the big action happening in the early 20c)
Richard's latest book on the British origins of Communism is utterly amazing, and I am very glad he has put more for us to read online 🫡 I hope he collaborates more with Alex Benesch, who writes along similar themes from the German perspective.
For Austria-Germany. Fat fingered.
British replicated what the P.H.D. strategy had done Austria-Germany
true investigative journalism, hats off
Thank you!